Get in touch
SOUTH JERSEY
PHILADELPHIA
FLORIDA

Helpful Tips Student Disciplinary Hearing

Cristina Pietri • Mar 03, 2023

Being accused of academic misconduct is a terrifying experience. The consequences of an investigation alone could potentially jeopardize all the time, effort, money and sacrifices you have made towards your goal of holding a college degree.  Student disciplinary procedures are every day more common, and many students are caught off guard and blindsided by the time when they first learn there is an investigation against them. Whether it was a mistake, a misunderstanding or a lie from someone with an ulterior motive, the truth of the matter is that you need to understand the process in order to defend yourself.



The presence of a student advisor or attorney since the early stages of the investigation tends to make a remarkable the difference in the manner the university conducts the investigation. Under their guidance, advice and support, the student is better prepared to be wary of practices and tactics universities use that may not be in your best interests. However, the student is not always aware that there are people who work on these cases. and when they do, some of them come to us for our advice later in the process. This article is to give you some and tips – in a general sense- of things to pay special attention.


The first principle I want you to remember is that in a student disciplinary proceeding, the University is not going to help you, it’s not going to defend you and they  will not conduct the investigation with your best interests in mind. Their investigation and outcome are to protect themselves from any liability or potential lawsuits, so you must to be very careful with what you say and with who you speak. I cannot stress it enough: if you are being investigated for student misconduct, and the investigator tells you that they just want to help you, don’t believe them. They are part of the University, and the school is only interested in protecting themselves from potential legal liability, even if it means at your academic or professional future’s expense. Bear in mind, that the Student Handbook or Student Code of Conduct from your school (which dictates the student misconduct process) is written by the University, enforced by the University and if there is a suspicion of student misconduct, investigated by the university. The hearing will also be before the university’s chosen panel or hearing officer, which will in turn adjudicate responsibility and impose sanctions. Not only that, but if you exercise your right to appeal, it will also be before another individual or panel chosen by the University, or school’s officials such as deans and provosts.  Furthermore, school officials are professionals who have many years of training and experience in student affairs, so you will automatically be at a disadvantage. They probably see your type of case many times every day. You’re playing in their court, by their rules, made to protect them. What’s worse: those rules and regulations have been carefully prepared and curated by a team of attorneys that are highly skilled in academic matters and policy. Not only the rules are carefully made by attorneys, but they also have a General Counsel or Legal team at their disposition to consult in a wide array of matters. 


I don’t mean to scare you. What I mean to say is they have all the power; they are covered by every angle and you must be prepared to present a strong case. 


The student disciplinary process is made up of different stages. Not every student misconduct investigation leads to a disciplinary hearing. It’s also worth noting that every university has different rules and procedures. That being said, I want to elaborate on student disciplinary hearings, because it’s (understandably) one of the main concerns and the more formal stage of the student misconduct adjudication process 


  • Have a Student Advisor present: My first word of advice, without any doubt, would be to exercise your right to have an advisor present at the hearing. Most universities allow the student to bring a student advisor or support person. The ideal advisor would be an attorney who has experience in student cases, or an attorney that has courtroom experience. The moment an attorney advisor gets involved in a disciplinary proceeding, the tone and process changes and they’re forced to be more thorough, diligent, and careful. Most students don’t even know that there are law firms that work with every stage of the student disciplinary process. Law firms such as the one I work with, Lento Law Group, have entire teams dedicated to Student Disciplinary Defense with plenty of experience both in Student Disciplinary Proceedings and in the courtroom. However, your advisor or support person doesn’t have to be an attorney. It can be a mentor, a parent, even your best friend.  It’s helpful to have another set of fresh eyes or perspective to consult if you get confused or cornered by a school official or the hearing officer. Even if the person isn’t an attorney, having someone by your side will make you feel less vulnerable, and you would have a familiar face to be by your side in such stressful time.

  • Start building your case as soon as possible: the University will possibly send you a Hearing Notification Letter where they state the day, time, and place of the hearing. The Hearing Notification tends to be sent just a few days before the hearing, so it’s best if you by then have collected the mosr evidence possible to strengthen your case. The Hearing Notification letter will also give even shorter deadlines to announce your witnesses and to notify them with any evidence you intend to present at the hearing.
  • Notify the school of your advisor appearance: if a student advisor or support person will be attending the hearing, you must notify the school of that fact, and also provide their names.
  • Notify all the evidence and witnesses you intend to use within the time frame given by the school: or you may risk the chance of them objection to the evidence on the grounds it was nor provided to them in a timely manner.
  • Read the Hearing Notification very thoroughly: the letter is essentially the school’s entire case against you. It announces the charges against you and how they are going to prove it. That is, it usually includes a list of the witnesses for the University, a summary of their testimony along with all the documents which they will be using against you. You must make sure that they include all the evidence they say they’re providing with the notification. 
  • Prepare your opening statement: it is not required but I always recommend students to prepare a brief opening statement, so the hearing officials or panels know what your defense is and how you intend to prove it.
  • Prepare your witnesses and practice their testimony:  don’t “wing it”; remember you are against experienced university officials.
  • Once in the hearing, listen very carefully to the witnesses’ testimony against you: so, you can provide rebuttal testimony or cross-examine that witness.
  • In cross-examination you should focus on the part of their testimony you are positive is incorrect, inaccurate, or false.


The previous information is not intended to substitute legal advice, it is only for informative purposes. Every case is different, and an education attorney or student advisor is best educated, trained and experienced to provide you with professional advise that will adjust to your particular needs.

More News & Resources

By Joseph D. Lento 03 May, 2024
Nurses facing abuse or other misconduct charges over inappropriate patient restraint need skilled defense representation.
By Lawrence A. Katz 26 Apr, 2024
The news has recently had almost daily stories about the social media app, Tik Tok, and Congress’ threat to make using it illegal unless its ownership is transferred from its present Chinese owners. The argument for requiring the removal of Chinses owners is that they require access to personal and confidential information and that poses a national security risk. I have seen tech experts who question whether transferring ownership will actually eliminate that threat. They suggest that if the computer code for the Tik Top app already contains a “backdoor” enabling the secret access to information, changing ownership will not correct the problem. This blog is not intended to discuss those issues. Instead, we will address the claims by many that preventing people from using Tik Tok is a First Amendment free speech violation. I suggest that it is not. This is a tidbit to keep for your next Trivia Night. The First Amendment was originally only intended to prohibit the federal government from interfering with free speech. It was not until 1925, in Gitlow v. New York, that the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited all levels of government (states and local governments) from interfering with free speech. A government can limit speech if doing so is content neutral. As the United States Supreme Court has explained, “A regulation of speech is facially content based under the First Amendment if it ‘target[s] speech based on its communicative content’—that is, if it ‘applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed.’” City of Austin v. Reagan Nat'l Advert. of Austin, LLC, 596 U.S. 61 (2022). Thus, where a transit system prohibited all advertisements on its premises, the Court held that the limit was constitutional because it applied to all subjects and opinions. In contrast, a limitation on a single message is not permitted. In Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. SEPTA, 975 F.3d 300, 303 (3d Cir. 2020), a Court of Appeals ruled against a public transit agency’s refusal to accept advertisements that were political or discussed matters of public debate. The regulation was not content neutral. The prohibition against Tik Tok would likely be found constitutional because the prohibition is not based on a specific subject or viewpoint. There is one other issue that must be raised --- it is highly unlikely that a government could prohibit all means of public forums for speech. Even if content neutral, it is unlikely that a government could prohibit all social media any more than it could prohibit all newspapers. However, in the case of Tik Tok, prohibiting it from operating in the United States does not effectively prohibit all means of public forums as several other social media platforms still exist. Thus, the often-voiced opinion that eliminating Tik Tok denies its users their First Amendment rights is inaccurate.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr 26 Apr, 2024
While dogs are often referred to as “man’s best friend,” dogs can also be dangerous, and even the friendliest of dogs may bite when provoked. This this blog post we will discuss some general legal theory about animal bites, including dog bites, and outline what you should do if you were bit by another person’s dog or other animal. Can I Sue for a Dog Bite? Before I answer this question, it is important to understand the legal theory that undergirds animal bite cases. The law classically categorized animals into two categories: domitae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically domesticated or tamed – and ferae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically feral, wild, or exotic. This distinction is significant legally because, generally speaking, those who possess a ferae naturae animal – for example, a tiger – do so at their own peril. This is because if ferae naturae animal bites another person, the owner of the animal is generally presumed to be at-fault. While the owner of a domitae naturae animal can also be held liable for the actions of that animal, generally, a bite by such an animal – for example, a cat or a dog – may not necessarily give rise to a presumption of fault. At least, that was the classical framework. This has been changed by individual laws in many states. Most states have adopted a strict-liability standard in connection with dog bites. This means that a biting dog’s owner will be held liable for injuries caused by the dog, even if the owner used reasonable care to restrain the dog or to protect or warn the other party. Often, this strict-liability view can be viewed as harsh, if one adheres to the “accidents happen” mentality. In recognition of the potentially harsh outcomes strict-liability may bring about, a handful of other states have adopted a “One-Bite Rule”. In essence, a One-Bite Rule is a law that provides that a dog owner may only be held liable if they knew or should have known that the dog has a vicious propensity or is prone to bite, and that owner would only have such knowledge if the dog has bitten someone in the past. In other words, the One-Bite Rule is called this because the owner of a dog with a propensity to bite essentially gets their first bite free because the owner will likely not be found liable for the first bite. This is consistent with the notion of the “foreseeability of the harm” that undergirds much of tort law – in other words, how could the owner foresee that his or her dog would bite if it has never done so before? Conversely, the owner should know, and should therefore be held liable, if the dog has bitten someone before. So, to answer the question of whether you can sue if you have been bitten by a dog, the answer, generally is yes, but the merits of you claim will depend largely on whether you live in a strict-liability state or a One-Bite Rule state. What Do I Do If I Have Been Bitten? While you may, of course, be panicked immediately following a dog bite, it is important to do the following: · Call 911 to report the incident. Make sure a police report is filed, and get a copy of it. · Get the dog owner’s name and contact information, if possible. · Try to get a picture of the dog and the owner, if possible. · Take pictures of the bite wounds while they are still fresh. · Go seek medical treatment, if necessary, and try to leave the appointment with a copy of your medical record in connection with the visit. · Contact a knowledgeable personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. If you or a loved one have been injured by a public actor or public entity, call the Lento Law Group today. Our team of knowledgeable and compassionate attorneys and support staff can help guide you while you work to pick up the pieces after a traumatic accident. Call Lento Law Group today at (856) 652-2000. We will fight to get you the recovery you deserve.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. 26 Apr, 2024
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. July 2023
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 20 April, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 April, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 March, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Lawrence A. Katz, Esquire • 07 Feb, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
Professional discipline in one state can affect a professional license in another state. Don’t run. Get help up front.
01 Mar, 2024
ERIC HAKEEM DEONTAYE MAYS, late Councilman Eric Mays's son and only next of kin, along with Bishop Patrick Munnerlyn, Community Outreach Specialist for the Lento Law Group, cordially invites the Flint community to a candlelight vigil to honor the remarkable life and legacy of Councilman Eric B. Mays. The vigil will take place on Saturday, March 2, at 6:00 PM in front of Flint City Hall, as we come together to celebrate a true hero of Flint, a relentless champion for the community, a visionary leader, a devoted public servant, and a cherished friend. Councilman Mays was a beacon of hope and strength for Flint, advocating tirelessly for the rights and well-being of its residents. His unwavering dedication to serving the community has left an indelible mark on the hearts of all who had the privilege of knowing him. As we gather to remember his remarkable contributions, let us light candles in unity to illuminate the path he paved toward a brighter future for Flint. This vigil is an opportunity for us to reflect on the profound impact of Councilman Mays’ work, to share stories of his courage and kindness, and to reaffirm our commitment to the values he embodied. Participants are welcome to bring their own candles, but candles will also be provided (as long as supplies last) to ensure that everyone can join in this act of remembrance and solidarity. Councilman Mays’ love for the people of Flint was boundless, and in return, he was deeply loved and respected by the community he served. As we mourn his passing, we also celebrate the legacy of a man who dedicated his life to making Flint a better place for all its residents. It has indeed been a sad week in Flint, but let us come together to honor a man who gave so much of himself to our city. Join us in front of Flint City Hall to pay tribute to Councilman Eric B. Mays, a man who deserves the best: our collective love, respect, and admiration. We invite everyone to come and show their support by standing in solidarity as we remember a great man who has left an everlasting mark on our community. Atlanta, GA • Birmingham, AL • Boulder, CO • Coral Springs, FL • Detroit, MI • El Paso, TX • Flint, MI • Honolulu, HI • Los Angeles, CA • Maui, HI Miami, FL • Mount Laurel, NJ • Newark, NJ • New York, NY • Orlando, FL • Philadelphia, PA • Puerta Plata, DR •Richmond, VA • Salt Lake City, UT San Juan, PR • Scottsdale, AZ • Washington, DC 
More Posts
Share by: