Get in touch
SOUTH JERSEY
PHILADELPHIA
FLORIDA

If You Have Been Injured in an Accident Caused by a Defective Commercial Vehicle, Our Firm Can Get You the Best Settlement

Milton Shook • Jul 18, 2022

Everyone who commutes back and forth from home to work via their own car or truck knows that traffic is heavier then ever these days, and because of that, the risks of an accident are also greater then ever. Accident happen to many people every single day.

 

Many traffic accidents come from drivers making mistakes while driving; there is, after all, a reason they are called "accidents." In some cases, however, an accident may be caused by design or manufacturing defects in vehicles, including commercial vehicles used by workers while doing their jobs. Given the size of many commercial vehicles, the damages caused by such an accident can be quite extensive, and can result in downright devastating injuries or even deaths to a number of workers, or even some innocent passersby.


The Increased Risk of Defective Commercial Vehicles

 

If a worker is injured or killed due to a collision caused by a defect in a commercial vehicle,  the injured party may have a valid legal claim for damages against a number of parties. Those parties can include the manufacturer, the distributor, the employer or even those persons involved in the operation of the vehicle, such as fleet maintenance workers. In many cases, commercial vehicles can  be very large, which means accident investigators could face a significant challenge to sort among all of the potential causes for the accident, and to  even determine whether a design or manufacturing defect is present.

 

If the investigation uncovers that the accident that led to the injury was caused by a defective commercial vehicle, many different parties may be liable, depending on the circumstances. For example, if a trucking company failed to replace a part due to cost cutting, and the failure of that part can be determined to have caused the accident, the trucking company may be responsible. If the designer or manufacturing company produced a faulty piece of equipment that directly caused or contributed to the crash, they could be found responsible, as well. In many cases, several parties can be held responsible, which can be good for the plaintiff, since multiple insurance companies, representing multiple parties, may have to chip in on a settlement.


The Most Common Types of Truck Equipment Failure


According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in a report produced in 2004, large truck accidents were cited as the primary cause in more than 12 percent of all traffic accidents with fatalities. This despite the fact that they only make up four percent of all registered vehicles on the road.

 

Just as importantly, truck equipment failure is one of the leading causes of truck accidents everywhere in the country. Even more tragically, most equipment failure crashes could have been prevented with proper maintenance. While there seems to be an impression that these defective and malfunctioning trucks suffer from massive problems, the fact of the matter is, these vehicles often have tens of thousands of pieces of equipment, all of which can fail at any time. The list of the most common commercial vehicle defects that lead to accidents includes:

 

  • Defective straps or tie downs that cause unsecured loads to shift or fall off the trailer
  • Defective coupling
  • Broken mirrors
  • Broken hydraulic hoses
  • Faulty windshield wipers
  • Defective wheels
  • Steering defects
  • Defective trailer hitch
  • Burned out headlights, taillights or turn signals
  • Broken defroster

 

In other words, the defects we often think of as "catastrophic" are often not as dangerous as others, which we may think of as "minor." These defects happen often, even though many federal and state laws are in effect all over he country to supposedly regulate the maintenance practices of truck drivers and their employers.  Usually, truck drivers are instructed to perform a complete inspection of their vehicles before each shift, regardless of the type or the length of the haul. Proper inspection and maintenance should eliminate the possibility of equipment failure or malfunction and prevent catastrophic injuries and damages caused by a crash.


Why the Risk of Defective Commercial Vehicles is Significant


There are a number of ways in which several dangerous defects can be found in a single commercial vehicle involved in an accident, and they may include any of the following:



  • One defect or a number of defects in the design and engineering of the vehicle. These defects could render the vehicle inherently dangerous and quite possibly defective, no matter how well the manufacturer ultimately put it together.
  • There can be commercial manufacturing flaws, in which factory-originated errors cause a normally well-crafted vehicle to malfunction. If the flaw effects safety features, this can be even more of a factor.
  • In some cases, a commercial vehicle is inherently dangerous, and the people at the trucking company with the responsibility of maintaining the vehicle in a manner intended to make it relatively safe and drivable failed to make it so. 
  • If a commercial vehicle is inherently dangerous and the vehicle's owners failed to properly warn drivers warn or failed to provide them with appropriate instructions for safe operation. If that failure can be proven to have been a factor, that can cost the trucking company a pretty penny, since federal regulations require all operators to be provided with clear warnings about how to use the relevant vehicle safely. In addition, operators are also entitled to receive clear details regarding any inherent risks.

 

Only Product Liability Experts Can Help You Win in a Commercial Vehicle Accident


Because of the complexity involved with investigating incidents involving potentially defective commercial vehicles, it is important that an accident victim consult with an attorney who understands these complexities, and can sort through all of the legal options available to you, to protect your rights.

 

The Commercial Vehicle Accident Attorneys at Lento Law Group have extensive experience handling cases for those who are victims of accidents involving defective commercial vehicles, and that includes many of the largest companies in the United States. If you or someone you know has been injured or killed in an accident caused by a defective commercial vehicle, call the Defective Commercial Vehicle Injury Lawyers at Lento Law Group immediately, so we can investigate thoroughly and get you the compensation you deserve for your injuries and other damages.

More News & Resources

By Joseph D. Lento 03 May, 2024
Nurses facing abuse or other misconduct charges over inappropriate patient restraint need skilled defense representation.
By Lawrence A. Katz 26 Apr, 2024
The news has recently had almost daily stories about the social media app, Tik Tok, and Congress’ threat to make using it illegal unless its ownership is transferred from its present Chinese owners. The argument for requiring the removal of Chinses owners is that they require access to personal and confidential information and that poses a national security risk. I have seen tech experts who question whether transferring ownership will actually eliminate that threat. They suggest that if the computer code for the Tik Top app already contains a “backdoor” enabling the secret access to information, changing ownership will not correct the problem. This blog is not intended to discuss those issues. Instead, we will address the claims by many that preventing people from using Tik Tok is a First Amendment free speech violation. I suggest that it is not. This is a tidbit to keep for your next Trivia Night. The First Amendment was originally only intended to prohibit the federal government from interfering with free speech. It was not until 1925, in Gitlow v. New York, that the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited all levels of government (states and local governments) from interfering with free speech. A government can limit speech if doing so is content neutral. As the United States Supreme Court has explained, “A regulation of speech is facially content based under the First Amendment if it ‘target[s] speech based on its communicative content’—that is, if it ‘applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed.’” City of Austin v. Reagan Nat'l Advert. of Austin, LLC, 596 U.S. 61 (2022). Thus, where a transit system prohibited all advertisements on its premises, the Court held that the limit was constitutional because it applied to all subjects and opinions. In contrast, a limitation on a single message is not permitted. In Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. SEPTA, 975 F.3d 300, 303 (3d Cir. 2020), a Court of Appeals ruled against a public transit agency’s refusal to accept advertisements that were political or discussed matters of public debate. The regulation was not content neutral. The prohibition against Tik Tok would likely be found constitutional because the prohibition is not based on a specific subject or viewpoint. There is one other issue that must be raised --- it is highly unlikely that a government could prohibit all means of public forums for speech. Even if content neutral, it is unlikely that a government could prohibit all social media any more than it could prohibit all newspapers. However, in the case of Tik Tok, prohibiting it from operating in the United States does not effectively prohibit all means of public forums as several other social media platforms still exist. Thus, the often-voiced opinion that eliminating Tik Tok denies its users their First Amendment rights is inaccurate.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr 26 Apr, 2024
While dogs are often referred to as “man’s best friend,” dogs can also be dangerous, and even the friendliest of dogs may bite when provoked. This this blog post we will discuss some general legal theory about animal bites, including dog bites, and outline what you should do if you were bit by another person’s dog or other animal. Can I Sue for a Dog Bite? Before I answer this question, it is important to understand the legal theory that undergirds animal bite cases. The law classically categorized animals into two categories: domitae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically domesticated or tamed – and ferae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically feral, wild, or exotic. This distinction is significant legally because, generally speaking, those who possess a ferae naturae animal – for example, a tiger – do so at their own peril. This is because if ferae naturae animal bites another person, the owner of the animal is generally presumed to be at-fault. While the owner of a domitae naturae animal can also be held liable for the actions of that animal, generally, a bite by such an animal – for example, a cat or a dog – may not necessarily give rise to a presumption of fault. At least, that was the classical framework. This has been changed by individual laws in many states. Most states have adopted a strict-liability standard in connection with dog bites. This means that a biting dog’s owner will be held liable for injuries caused by the dog, even if the owner used reasonable care to restrain the dog or to protect or warn the other party. Often, this strict-liability view can be viewed as harsh, if one adheres to the “accidents happen” mentality. In recognition of the potentially harsh outcomes strict-liability may bring about, a handful of other states have adopted a “One-Bite Rule”. In essence, a One-Bite Rule is a law that provides that a dog owner may only be held liable if they knew or should have known that the dog has a vicious propensity or is prone to bite, and that owner would only have such knowledge if the dog has bitten someone in the past. In other words, the One-Bite Rule is called this because the owner of a dog with a propensity to bite essentially gets their first bite free because the owner will likely not be found liable for the first bite. This is consistent with the notion of the “foreseeability of the harm” that undergirds much of tort law – in other words, how could the owner foresee that his or her dog would bite if it has never done so before? Conversely, the owner should know, and should therefore be held liable, if the dog has bitten someone before. So, to answer the question of whether you can sue if you have been bitten by a dog, the answer, generally is yes, but the merits of you claim will depend largely on whether you live in a strict-liability state or a One-Bite Rule state. What Do I Do If I Have Been Bitten? While you may, of course, be panicked immediately following a dog bite, it is important to do the following: · Call 911 to report the incident. Make sure a police report is filed, and get a copy of it. · Get the dog owner’s name and contact information, if possible. · Try to get a picture of the dog and the owner, if possible. · Take pictures of the bite wounds while they are still fresh. · Go seek medical treatment, if necessary, and try to leave the appointment with a copy of your medical record in connection with the visit. · Contact a knowledgeable personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. If you or a loved one have been injured by a public actor or public entity, call the Lento Law Group today. Our team of knowledgeable and compassionate attorneys and support staff can help guide you while you work to pick up the pieces after a traumatic accident. Call Lento Law Group today at (856) 652-2000. We will fight to get you the recovery you deserve.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. 26 Apr, 2024
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. July 2023
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 20 April, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 April, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 March, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Lawrence A. Katz, Esquire • 07 Feb, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
Professional discipline in one state can affect a professional license in another state. Don’t run. Get help up front.
01 Mar, 2024
ERIC HAKEEM DEONTAYE MAYS, late Councilman Eric Mays's son and only next of kin, along with Bishop Patrick Munnerlyn, Community Outreach Specialist for the Lento Law Group, cordially invites the Flint community to a candlelight vigil to honor the remarkable life and legacy of Councilman Eric B. Mays. The vigil will take place on Saturday, March 2, at 6:00 PM in front of Flint City Hall, as we come together to celebrate a true hero of Flint, a relentless champion for the community, a visionary leader, a devoted public servant, and a cherished friend. Councilman Mays was a beacon of hope and strength for Flint, advocating tirelessly for the rights and well-being of its residents. His unwavering dedication to serving the community has left an indelible mark on the hearts of all who had the privilege of knowing him. As we gather to remember his remarkable contributions, let us light candles in unity to illuminate the path he paved toward a brighter future for Flint. This vigil is an opportunity for us to reflect on the profound impact of Councilman Mays’ work, to share stories of his courage and kindness, and to reaffirm our commitment to the values he embodied. Participants are welcome to bring their own candles, but candles will also be provided (as long as supplies last) to ensure that everyone can join in this act of remembrance and solidarity. Councilman Mays’ love for the people of Flint was boundless, and in return, he was deeply loved and respected by the community he served. As we mourn his passing, we also celebrate the legacy of a man who dedicated his life to making Flint a better place for all its residents. It has indeed been a sad week in Flint, but let us come together to honor a man who gave so much of himself to our city. Join us in front of Flint City Hall to pay tribute to Councilman Eric B. Mays, a man who deserves the best: our collective love, respect, and admiration. We invite everyone to come and show their support by standing in solidarity as we remember a great man who has left an everlasting mark on our community. Atlanta, GA • Birmingham, AL • Boulder, CO • Coral Springs, FL • Detroit, MI • El Paso, TX • Flint, MI • Honolulu, HI • Los Angeles, CA • Maui, HI Miami, FL • Mount Laurel, NJ • Newark, NJ • New York, NY • Orlando, FL • Philadelphia, PA • Puerta Plata, DR •Richmond, VA • Salt Lake City, UT San Juan, PR • Scottsdale, AZ • Washington, DC 
More Posts
Share by: