Get in touch
SOUTH JERSEY
PHILADELPHIA
FLORIDA

Navigating NIL: Understanding Name, Image, and Likeness Deals for Amateur Athletes

Terrell A. Ratliff • Jul 10, 2023

In recent years, the landscape of collegiate sports has undergone a significant transformation with the introduction of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights for amateur athletes. These rights allow college athletes to profit from their own name, image, and likeness through endorsement deals, sponsorships, and other commercial opportunities. This shift has sparked debates about fairness, amateurism, and the future of college sports. In this blog post, we will explore the concept of NIL deals, their implications for amateur athletes, and the challenges and opportunities they present.


Amateurism has long been a cornerstone of college sports, with athletes prohibited from earning money or benefiting financially from their athletic abilities. However, the push for NIL rights gained momentum as athletes and advocates argued for fair compensation and the ability to capitalize on their own marketability. This led to changes in NCAA policies and state legislation that paved the way for amateur athletes to engage in NIL deals.


NIL deals refer to the commercial agreements between amateur athletes and third parties, such as brands, businesses, or marketing agencies, that allow athletes to monetize their name, image, and likeness. These deals can include endorsement contracts, social media promotions, merchandise collaborations, and more. NIL deals empower athletes to leverage their personal brands and profit from their athletic achievements while still maintaining their collegiate eligibility.


NIL deals offer numerous benefits for amateur athletes. Firstly, they provide a means for athletes to earn income and gain financial independence while pursuing their education and athletic careers. This financial support can help cover living expenses, tuition fees, and other financial burdens. Additionally, NIL deals can enhance an athlete's personal brand, increase their visibility and fan engagement, and provide valuable networking opportunities within the business and marketing world.


While NIL deals bring new opportunities, they also come with a set of regulations that athletes must navigate to maintain compliance. Each state may have its own specific rules and guidelines, and athletes must ensure that their agreements align with both state and NCAA regulations. It is crucial for athletes to understand the limitations and restrictions on certain types of endorsements or partnerships to avoid any potential eligibility issues.


To assist amateur athletes in navigating the complexities of NIL deals, many universities and organizations have established educational resources and support systems. These resources aim to provide athletes with guidance on contract negotiations, financial management, brand building, and legal considerations. By empowering athletes with knowledge and support, these initiatives contribute to their long-term success both on and off the field.


While NIL deals offer significant opportunities, they also present challenges and considerations. Athletes must carefully evaluate potential partnerships to ensure alignment with their personal values, brand image, and long-term goals. They must also be mindful of the time commitments and potential distractions that come with managing endorsement obligations alongside their academic and athletic responsibilities.


The introduction of NIL rights has undoubtedly transformed the collegiate sports landscape. It has led to discussions about the future of amateurism, athlete compensation, and the power dynamics within college athletics. As more athletes engage in NIL deals, the balance between the rights of athletes and the integrity of college sports continues to evolve, prompting ongoing debates and potential reforms.


NIL deals also present opportunities for athletes to develop essential skills in entrepreneurship, marketing, and personal branding. By actively participating in managing their own endorsements and partnerships, athletes can gain valuable experience and insights into the business world. This hands-on involvement in shaping their own careers can lead to valuable entrepreneurial opportunities beyond their athletic endeavors. It empowers athletes to build their personal brands, establish connections with industry professionals, and explore potential career paths in marketing, sports management, or brand representation.


As NIL deals continue to evolve, there are important considerations for the future. The impact on recruiting and competitive balance in college sports is a key area of concern. The potential for inequities to arise between high-profile athletes and those in less visible sports or smaller programs is also a point of discussion. Striking a balance between providing opportunities for all athletes and avoiding a professionalization of college sports remains a challenge that requires ongoing attention and dialogue.


The introduction of NIL rights has ushered in a new era for amateur athletes, offering them the opportunity to capitalize on their name, image, and likeness. NIL deals provide financial support, personal brand development, and entrepreneurial prospects. However, athletes must navigate compliance regulations, make informed decisions, and balance their commitments. As the landscape of collegiate sports continues to evolve, it is crucial to monitor the impact of NIL deals on the athletes, the institutions, and the overall integrity of college athletics.


In conclusion, NIL deals represent a significant shift in the landscape of collegiate sports, empowering amateur athletes to monetize their name, image, and likeness. While challenges and considerations exist, the potential benefits in terms of financial support, personal branding, and entrepreneurial opportunities are undeniable. As the conversation around NIL continues to unfold, it is essential to strike a balance that preserves the collegiate sports experience, ensures fairness and equality, and supports the long-term success and well-being of amateur athletes.

More News & Resources

Defending Nurse Misconduct Allegations for Patient Restraint

By Joseph D. Lento • 03 May, 2024
Nurses facing abuse or other misconduct charges over inappropriate patient restraint need skilled defense representation.

TIK TOK

By Lawrence A. Katz • 26 Apr, 2024
The news has recently had almost daily stories about the social media app, Tik Tok, and Congress’ threat to make using it illegal unless its ownership is transferred from its present Chinese owners. The argument for requiring the removal of Chinses owners is that they require access to personal and confidential information and that poses a national security risk. I have seen tech experts who question whether transferring ownership will actually eliminate that threat. They suggest that if the computer code for the Tik Top app already contains a “backdoor” enabling the secret access to information, changing ownership will not correct the problem. This blog is not intended to discuss those issues. Instead, we will address the claims by many that preventing people from using Tik Tok is a First Amendment free speech violation. I suggest that it is not. This is a tidbit to keep for your next Trivia Night. The First Amendment was originally only intended to prohibit the federal government from interfering with free speech. It was not until 1925, in Gitlow v. New York, that the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited all levels of government (states and local governments) from interfering with free speech. A government can limit speech if doing so is content neutral. As the United States Supreme Court has explained, “A regulation of speech is facially content based under the First Amendment if it ‘target[s] speech based on its communicative content’—that is, if it ‘applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed.’” City of Austin v. Reagan Nat'l Advert. of Austin, LLC, 596 U.S. 61 (2022). Thus, where a transit system prohibited all advertisements on its premises, the Court held that the limit was constitutional because it applied to all subjects and opinions. In contrast, a limitation on a single message is not permitted. In Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. SEPTA, 975 F.3d 300, 303 (3d Cir. 2020), a Court of Appeals ruled against a public transit agency’s refusal to accept advertisements that were political or discussed matters of public debate. The regulation was not content neutral. The prohibition against Tik Tok would likely be found constitutional because the prohibition is not based on a specific subject or viewpoint. There is one other issue that must be raised --- it is highly unlikely that a government could prohibit all means of public forums for speech. Even if content neutral, it is unlikely that a government could prohibit all social media any more than it could prohibit all newspapers. However, in the case of Tik Tok, prohibiting it from operating in the United States does not effectively prohibit all means of public forums as several other social media platforms still exist. Thus, the often-voiced opinion that eliminating Tik Tok denies its users their First Amendment rights is inaccurate.

DOG BITES – WHAT TO DO IF YOU’VE BEEN BIT

By Joseph Cannizzo Jr • 26 Apr, 2024
While dogs are often referred to as “man’s best friend,” dogs can also be dangerous, and even the friendliest of dogs may bite when provoked. This this blog post we will discuss some general legal theory about animal bites, including dog bites, and outline what you should do if you were bit by another person’s dog or other animal. Can I Sue for a Dog Bite? Before I answer this question, it is important to understand the legal theory that undergirds animal bite cases. The law classically categorized animals into two categories: domitae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically domesticated or tamed – and ferae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically feral, wild, or exotic. This distinction is significant legally because, generally speaking, those who possess a ferae naturae animal – for example, a tiger – do so at their own peril. This is because if ferae naturae animal bites another person, the owner of the animal is generally presumed to be at-fault. While the owner of a domitae naturae animal can also be held liable for the actions of that animal, generally, a bite by such an animal – for example, a cat or a dog – may not necessarily give rise to a presumption of fault. At least, that was the classical framework. This has been changed by individual laws in many states. Most states have adopted a strict-liability standard in connection with dog bites. This means that a biting dog’s owner will be held liable for injuries caused by the dog, even if the owner used reasonable care to restrain the dog or to protect or warn the other party. Often, this strict-liability view can be viewed as harsh, if one adheres to the “accidents happen” mentality. In recognition of the potentially harsh outcomes strict-liability may bring about, a handful of other states have adopted a “One-Bite Rule”. In essence, a One-Bite Rule is a law that provides that a dog owner may only be held liable if they knew or should have known that the dog has a vicious propensity or is prone to bite, and that owner would only have such knowledge if the dog has bitten someone in the past. In other words, the One-Bite Rule is called this because the owner of a dog with a propensity to bite essentially gets their first bite free because the owner will likely not be found liable for the first bite. This is consistent with the notion of the “foreseeability of the harm” that undergirds much of tort law – in other words, how could the owner foresee that his or her dog would bite if it has never done so before? Conversely, the owner should know, and should therefore be held liable, if the dog has bitten someone before. So, to answer the question of whether you can sue if you have been bitten by a dog, the answer, generally is yes, but the merits of you claim will depend largely on whether you live in a strict-liability state or a One-Bite Rule state. What Do I Do If I Have Been Bitten? While you may, of course, be panicked immediately following a dog bite, it is important to do the following: · Call 911 to report the incident. Make sure a police report is filed, and get a copy of it. · Get the dog owner’s name and contact information, if possible. · Try to get a picture of the dog and the owner, if possible. · Take pictures of the bite wounds while they are still fresh. · Go seek medical treatment, if necessary, and try to leave the appointment with a copy of your medical record in connection with the visit. · Contact a knowledgeable personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. If you or a loved one have been injured by a public actor or public entity, call the Lento Law Group today. Our team of knowledgeable and compassionate attorneys and support staff can help guide you while you work to pick up the pieces after a traumatic accident. Call Lento Law Group today at (856) 652-2000. We will fight to get you the recovery you deserve.

You Can’t Sue The King!: Understanding The Tort Claims Notice

By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. • 26 Apr, 2024
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. July 2023

A.I. Cheating Allegation for Using Grammarly

By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff • 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 20 April, 2024

What Happens If I Die Without a Will or Trust

By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff • 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 April, 2024

$65,000,000 in Punitive Damage for Trump’s Defamation case! Why so much?

08 Mar, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 March, 2024

GETTING TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

08 Mar, 2024
By Lawrence A. Katz, Esquire • 07 Feb, 2024

License Discipline in One State Affects Licensed Work in Another State

08 Mar, 2024
Professional discipline in one state can affect a professional license in another state. Don’t run. Get help up front.

Eric HaKeem Deontaye Mays

01 Mar, 2024
ERIC HAKEEM DEONTAYE MAYS, late Councilman Eric Mays's son and only next of kin, along with Bishop Patrick Munnerlyn, Community Outreach Specialist for the Lento Law Group, cordially invites the Flint community to a candlelight vigil to honor the remarkable life and legacy of Councilman Eric B. Mays. The vigil will take place on Saturday, March 2, at 6:00 PM in front of Flint City Hall, as we come together to celebrate a true hero of Flint, a relentless champion for the community, a visionary leader, a devoted public servant, and a cherished friend. Councilman Mays was a beacon of hope and strength for Flint, advocating tirelessly for the rights and well-being of its residents. His unwavering dedication to serving the community has left an indelible mark on the hearts of all who had the privilege of knowing him. As we gather to remember his remarkable contributions, let us light candles in unity to illuminate the path he paved toward a brighter future for Flint. This vigil is an opportunity for us to reflect on the profound impact of Councilman Mays’ work, to share stories of his courage and kindness, and to reaffirm our commitment to the values he embodied. Participants are welcome to bring their own candles, but candles will also be provided (as long as supplies last) to ensure that everyone can join in this act of remembrance and solidarity. Councilman Mays’ love for the people of Flint was boundless, and in return, he was deeply loved and respected by the community he served. As we mourn his passing, we also celebrate the legacy of a man who dedicated his life to making Flint a better place for all its residents. It has indeed been a sad week in Flint, but let us come together to honor a man who gave so much of himself to our city. Join us in front of Flint City Hall to pay tribute to Councilman Eric B. Mays, a man who deserves the best: our collective love, respect, and admiration. We invite everyone to come and show their support by standing in solidarity as we remember a great man who has left an everlasting mark on our community. Atlanta, GA • Birmingham, AL • Boulder, CO • Coral Springs, FL • Detroit, MI • El Paso, TX • Flint, MI • Honolulu, HI • Los Angeles, CA • Maui, HI Miami, FL • Mount Laurel, NJ • Newark, NJ • New York, NY • Orlando, FL • Philadelphia, PA • Puerta Plata, DR •Richmond, VA • Salt Lake City, UT San Juan, PR • Scottsdale, AZ • Washington, DC 
More Posts
Share by: