Get in touch
SOUTH JERSEY
PHILADELPHIA
FLORIDA

Righting the Ship with PIP

David Haislip • Jan 01, 2021

Understanding Personal Injury Protection

Now that it’s the start of a New Year it might be a good time to take stock of things on the auto insurance front to see how well covered we are moving into 2021. Particularly, if you have been involved in a motor vehicle accident in the State of New Jersey, it is very important that you understand what benefits your auto insurance policy can afford you insofar as your medical treatment is concerned. New Jersey is a “no-fault” state. That means that when you are injured in an accident, you are responsible for the costs of your own medical treatment. Often, many people injured in a motor vehicle accident do not understand this – “Why should I pay? He hit me!” is a common plea heard by many a personal injury attorney in no-fault states.


What is PIP?


Fortunately, however, your auto carrier provides a policy selection to help alleviate the personal financial burden of seeking treatment for your injuries – Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”). In New Jersey, insured drivers who have PIP coverage on their auto policy can utilize PIP coverage to pay for their medical treatment in very much the same way they would otherwise use their health insurance. PIP coverage limits in NJ ranges from between the minimum of $15,000 to the limit of $250,000, depending on your selection.


When seeking treatment for the injuries you have sustained in a motor vehicle accident, it is critical to ensure that you provide all of your treating providers – be they doctors, physical therapy, or radiology offices, for example – with your auto insurance information,
in addition to your health insurance information. Every provider should be given the Insurance Company Name, Policy Number, Claim Number, and the name and contact information of the adjuster assigned to your claim. This is because, it is advisable in many cases that your treatment be billed through PIP first, and your health insurance secondarily. I will explain why momentarily.


When your provider bills through PIP, you will only be responsible for the deductible amount you selected, ranging from $250.00 to $2,500.00 and a co-pay amount of 20% of the first $5,000.00 in treatment. After the first $5,000.00 in medical bills, PIP picks up 100% of the medical bills, until exhaustion or cut off.


Why Treat through PIP First? The answer? – ERISA


The reason why, in many cases, you want the maximum extent of your medical treatment billed through PIP first is because some health insurance plans, particularly those provided by your employer, may be what is referred to as a “self-funded ERISA” plan. “ERISA” comes from the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, a federal law that governs retirement, health, life, and disability benefits for Americans. ERISA sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established pension and health plans in private industry to provide protection for employees in these plans. Among other things, ERISA requires plans to provide participants with important information about plan features and funding; provide fiduciary responsibilities for those who manage and control plan assets; require plans to establish a grievance and appeals process for participants to get benefits from their plans; and give participants the right to sue for benefits and breaches of fiduciary duty.


As ERISA relates to personal injury suits, providers of ERISA health insurance plans which are self-funded have a right to seek reimbursement (in a process called subrogation) for the treatment they paid for, out of the proceeds of a personal injury suit. In other words, if your health insurance plan is a self-funded ERISA plan, you treated through your health insurance, and you receive a financial recovery as a result of your personal injury claim, your health insurance can assert a lien against your recovery to be paid back for the monies they spent to cover the cost of your treatment. 


Unfortunately, if you have sustained grave injuries requiring extensive medical treatment, and you have treated primarily through a self-funded ERISA plan (in other words, being “health primary”), you could see the bulk of your recovery go to your health insurance company to compensate them, instead of into your own pocket! Obviously, we don’t want that. 


That is why, in most cases, it is best to have your treating providers bill through PIP first in order to minimize any residual cost which may be passed on to your health insurance provider to cover. Of course, which plan provides a cheaper co-pay and deductible is always a factor in making this determination, but provided you can swing these initial out-of-pocket costs, what you stand to save on the tail-end by treating through PIP as opposed to a self-funded ERISA heath plan can potentially lead to a significantly larger recovery at the end of your personal injury suit, not owing your health insurer reimbursement. 


To determine whether your health insurance is a self-funded ERISA plan, your attorney will contact the insurer to ascertain this. In the meantime though, if you did not provide any of your treating medical providers with both your auto insurance’s PIP information and your health insurance information, you should reach out to their billing offices and apprise them of this information so as to avoid being billed unnecessarily. This most frequently happens for a hospital ER bill, as most people have not yet set up a PIP claim with their auto carrier and, therefore, can’t yet provide that information to the hospital.


What if I run out of PIP coverage?


As indicated earlier, PIP coverage begins at a minimum of $15,000 and caps at a limit of $250,000 in treatment. Obviously, the higher the amount of PIP coverage you select, the higher you can expect your monthly auto insurance premium to be. Unsurprisingly then, there are many people who choose the $15,000 minimum PIP coverage, thinking they will not be involved in an accident any time soon, and wanting to save money on their car insurance each month. Naturally, if you have minimal PIP coverage and you are still treating, you may wonder what happens if you exhaust it. 


First and foremost, do not stop pursuing your medical treatment just because you have exhausted PIP. If you stop, your injuries could get worse and you may not recover as well as you would have if you had kept going to the doctor. If you do exhaust your PIP coverage though, logically, one of the first things you can do is contact your health insurance provider and find out if they will cover your medical treatment. While some of your treatment may be covered, you may still be responsible for copays, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses. If so, make sure to keep track of these costs, as you may be able to include them in your personal injury claim filed against the other driver’s insurance. Bear in mind, however, as you would now be treating through your health insurance, the ERISA complications mentioned earlier could come into play.


Alternatively, if you have exhausted PIP and cannot utilize your health insurance for further treatment (perhaps because you have no health insurance, for example), another option is to discuss with your treating providers whether they would be willing to accept a Letter of Protection (“LOP”). A Letter of Protection is essentially a promissory letter sent by your personal injury attorney to your treating provider which, if accepted by the provider, allows the injured person to continue treating in exchange for an agreement to pay the bill out of proceeds of the personal injury claim. In other words, you have assigned a portion of your recovery to your doctor as payment. Unfortunately, if there is no recovery at the conclusion of the claim, the medical provider would still have the right to pursue collection efforts against the injured person, so LOPs should be entered into with care. Even so, they can be useful if an unpaid provider intends to send your unpaid bill into collections – a LOP may stop them from doing so. 


Been involved in an accident?


To sum up, it is always important to have a firm understanding of the coverage to which you are entitled under your auto insurance policy, and if you have been involved in a motor vehicle accident and sustained injuries, understanding your personal injury protection benefits is particularly critical. 


If you have been involved in a motor vehicle accident and have questions regarding your insurance coverage, contact the Lento Law Group today. We are committed to helping those who have sustained injuries through the carelessness of others. We will be happy to answer your questions and help you get the financial recovery you deserve!

More News & Resources

By Joseph D. Lento 03 May, 2024
Nurses facing abuse or other misconduct charges over inappropriate patient restraint need skilled defense representation.
By Lawrence A. Katz 26 Apr, 2024
The news has recently had almost daily stories about the social media app, Tik Tok, and Congress’ threat to make using it illegal unless its ownership is transferred from its present Chinese owners. The argument for requiring the removal of Chinses owners is that they require access to personal and confidential information and that poses a national security risk. I have seen tech experts who question whether transferring ownership will actually eliminate that threat. They suggest that if the computer code for the Tik Top app already contains a “backdoor” enabling the secret access to information, changing ownership will not correct the problem. This blog is not intended to discuss those issues. Instead, we will address the claims by many that preventing people from using Tik Tok is a First Amendment free speech violation. I suggest that it is not. This is a tidbit to keep for your next Trivia Night. The First Amendment was originally only intended to prohibit the federal government from interfering with free speech. It was not until 1925, in Gitlow v. New York, that the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited all levels of government (states and local governments) from interfering with free speech. A government can limit speech if doing so is content neutral. As the United States Supreme Court has explained, “A regulation of speech is facially content based under the First Amendment if it ‘target[s] speech based on its communicative content’—that is, if it ‘applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed.’” City of Austin v. Reagan Nat'l Advert. of Austin, LLC, 596 U.S. 61 (2022). Thus, where a transit system prohibited all advertisements on its premises, the Court held that the limit was constitutional because it applied to all subjects and opinions. In contrast, a limitation on a single message is not permitted. In Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. SEPTA, 975 F.3d 300, 303 (3d Cir. 2020), a Court of Appeals ruled against a public transit agency’s refusal to accept advertisements that were political or discussed matters of public debate. The regulation was not content neutral. The prohibition against Tik Tok would likely be found constitutional because the prohibition is not based on a specific subject or viewpoint. There is one other issue that must be raised --- it is highly unlikely that a government could prohibit all means of public forums for speech. Even if content neutral, it is unlikely that a government could prohibit all social media any more than it could prohibit all newspapers. However, in the case of Tik Tok, prohibiting it from operating in the United States does not effectively prohibit all means of public forums as several other social media platforms still exist. Thus, the often-voiced opinion that eliminating Tik Tok denies its users their First Amendment rights is inaccurate.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr 26 Apr, 2024
While dogs are often referred to as “man’s best friend,” dogs can also be dangerous, and even the friendliest of dogs may bite when provoked. This this blog post we will discuss some general legal theory about animal bites, including dog bites, and outline what you should do if you were bit by another person’s dog or other animal. Can I Sue for a Dog Bite? Before I answer this question, it is important to understand the legal theory that undergirds animal bite cases. The law classically categorized animals into two categories: domitae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically domesticated or tamed – and ferae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically feral, wild, or exotic. This distinction is significant legally because, generally speaking, those who possess a ferae naturae animal – for example, a tiger – do so at their own peril. This is because if ferae naturae animal bites another person, the owner of the animal is generally presumed to be at-fault. While the owner of a domitae naturae animal can also be held liable for the actions of that animal, generally, a bite by such an animal – for example, a cat or a dog – may not necessarily give rise to a presumption of fault. At least, that was the classical framework. This has been changed by individual laws in many states. Most states have adopted a strict-liability standard in connection with dog bites. This means that a biting dog’s owner will be held liable for injuries caused by the dog, even if the owner used reasonable care to restrain the dog or to protect or warn the other party. Often, this strict-liability view can be viewed as harsh, if one adheres to the “accidents happen” mentality. In recognition of the potentially harsh outcomes strict-liability may bring about, a handful of other states have adopted a “One-Bite Rule”. In essence, a One-Bite Rule is a law that provides that a dog owner may only be held liable if they knew or should have known that the dog has a vicious propensity or is prone to bite, and that owner would only have such knowledge if the dog has bitten someone in the past. In other words, the One-Bite Rule is called this because the owner of a dog with a propensity to bite essentially gets their first bite free because the owner will likely not be found liable for the first bite. This is consistent with the notion of the “foreseeability of the harm” that undergirds much of tort law – in other words, how could the owner foresee that his or her dog would bite if it has never done so before? Conversely, the owner should know, and should therefore be held liable, if the dog has bitten someone before. So, to answer the question of whether you can sue if you have been bitten by a dog, the answer, generally is yes, but the merits of you claim will depend largely on whether you live in a strict-liability state or a One-Bite Rule state. What Do I Do If I Have Been Bitten? While you may, of course, be panicked immediately following a dog bite, it is important to do the following: · Call 911 to report the incident. Make sure a police report is filed, and get a copy of it. · Get the dog owner’s name and contact information, if possible. · Try to get a picture of the dog and the owner, if possible. · Take pictures of the bite wounds while they are still fresh. · Go seek medical treatment, if necessary, and try to leave the appointment with a copy of your medical record in connection with the visit. · Contact a knowledgeable personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. If you or a loved one have been injured by a public actor or public entity, call the Lento Law Group today. Our team of knowledgeable and compassionate attorneys and support staff can help guide you while you work to pick up the pieces after a traumatic accident. Call Lento Law Group today at (856) 652-2000. We will fight to get you the recovery you deserve.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. 26 Apr, 2024
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. July 2023
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 20 April, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 April, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 March, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Lawrence A. Katz, Esquire • 07 Feb, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
Professional discipline in one state can affect a professional license in another state. Don’t run. Get help up front.
01 Mar, 2024
ERIC HAKEEM DEONTAYE MAYS, late Councilman Eric Mays's son and only next of kin, along with Bishop Patrick Munnerlyn, Community Outreach Specialist for the Lento Law Group, cordially invites the Flint community to a candlelight vigil to honor the remarkable life and legacy of Councilman Eric B. Mays. The vigil will take place on Saturday, March 2, at 6:00 PM in front of Flint City Hall, as we come together to celebrate a true hero of Flint, a relentless champion for the community, a visionary leader, a devoted public servant, and a cherished friend. Councilman Mays was a beacon of hope and strength for Flint, advocating tirelessly for the rights and well-being of its residents. His unwavering dedication to serving the community has left an indelible mark on the hearts of all who had the privilege of knowing him. As we gather to remember his remarkable contributions, let us light candles in unity to illuminate the path he paved toward a brighter future for Flint. This vigil is an opportunity for us to reflect on the profound impact of Councilman Mays’ work, to share stories of his courage and kindness, and to reaffirm our commitment to the values he embodied. Participants are welcome to bring their own candles, but candles will also be provided (as long as supplies last) to ensure that everyone can join in this act of remembrance and solidarity. Councilman Mays’ love for the people of Flint was boundless, and in return, he was deeply loved and respected by the community he served. As we mourn his passing, we also celebrate the legacy of a man who dedicated his life to making Flint a better place for all its residents. It has indeed been a sad week in Flint, but let us come together to honor a man who gave so much of himself to our city. Join us in front of Flint City Hall to pay tribute to Councilman Eric B. Mays, a man who deserves the best: our collective love, respect, and admiration. We invite everyone to come and show their support by standing in solidarity as we remember a great man who has left an everlasting mark on our community. Atlanta, GA • Birmingham, AL • Boulder, CO • Coral Springs, FL • Detroit, MI • El Paso, TX • Flint, MI • Honolulu, HI • Los Angeles, CA • Maui, HI Miami, FL • Mount Laurel, NJ • Newark, NJ • New York, NY • Orlando, FL • Philadelphia, PA • Puerta Plata, DR •Richmond, VA • Salt Lake City, UT San Juan, PR • Scottsdale, AZ • Washington, DC 
More Posts
Share by: