Get in touch
SOUTH JERSEY
PHILADELPHIA
FLORIDA

Student Disciplinary Records and Future Employment

Cristina Pietri • Jun 05, 2023

Introduction

Your main goal as a college student is to obtain a degree (or degrees) to prepare you to enter the job market as a professional, either because a degree is required, or because you want to stand out as a more attractive candidate for future employment. In today's competitive job market, employers often conduct thorough background checks on potential candidates to ensure they are making informed hiring decisions. One area that has gained increased attention in recent years is college student disciplinary records. As a student and as an aspiring professional, it's crucial to understand the implications of these records and how they may affect your career prospects. 


In this blog post, we will discuss the topic, exploring the significance of university disciplinary records, the disciplinary procedures conducted by the universities, the information employers can access, and steps you can take to mitigate any negative impact.


The Importance of Background Checks

Background checks have become an essential part of the hiring process for many employers. They are conducted to verify the accuracy of the information provided by candidates and to assess their suitability for a particular role. Employers aim to protect their organizations and ensure they are hiring individuals who align with their values, exhibit ethical conduct, and possess the necessary licenses and qualifications. Background checks are also conducted to find out if the candidate possesses traits that align with the company’s mission and values.


Employer Access to Disciplinary Records

Whether or not employers can access your college disciplinary records depends on various factors. Educational Institutions are bound by privacy laws, such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which restricts the disclosure of student records without their explicit consent.


However, there are exceptions when it comes to sharing information related to safety or in response to a legitimate inquiry by an employer. Generally, though, the employer would ask for your permission to request the record, or they will ask you to provide it to them. Of course, you can always deny the future employer access to your disciplinary records. However, often, doing so will raise suspicion from the employer, resulting in not taking your candidacy for any further consideration. Another factor to note is if the position is to work either in state or federal government, which sometimes require some sort of Clearance, and are much more invasive disclosure requirements. Many times, whether is in the application, or any form prior to the selection process, they require you to disclose information under penalty of perjury. 


Importance of understanding Disciplinary Procedures

College disciplinary records typically involve violations of academic or behavioral conduct codes within educational institutions. Examples of offenses may include plagiarism, cheating on exams, substance abuse, physical altercations, or harassment. When such incidents occur, colleges often maintain records as a means of tracking students' disciplinary history and promoting campus safety.


There is a close correlation between understanding the Student Conduct Code from the school, --which tends to state the regulations of the student conduct disciplinary process- and the student disciplinary record. This is, you can’t have a student disciplinary record without having gone through the disciplinary process outlined in the school policy or Student Code of Conduct. How you prepare for the disciplinary process may be a key component of a favorable outcome, and thus the possibility of not having a disciplinary record. 


In some universities, students who are accused of a Student Conduct violation are notified of the violation by writing. In some cases, students are offered to not contest the charges in exchange for a lenient sanction, such as repeating a course, writing articles reflecting about the alleged violation, completion of a program, or probation. However, many times, the student is not aware of the school’s policy regarding the sanctions and the disciplinary record and thus agree to the lesser sanction either because of their lack of knowledge, or the intimidation of the school’s disciplinary process. Understandably, the student finds themselves nervous when faced with the formality of a disciplinary hearing, so they end up accepting the charges, not knowing that it will result in having a disciplinary record for as long as the university policy allows, usually for years to come, depending on the severity of the violation. 


Some universities policy allows a student advisor to appear in a disciplinary hearing.  However, if you are being accused of academic misconduct, is important to have a professional to guide you as early in the process as possible, preferably in the investigation stage. The student advisor can be an attorney, an education professional, a parent, or even a friend. In my experience, when the student advisor is an attorney, universities often take the process –and the student’s rights more seriously. That student advisor would have read and understood thoroughly the Student Handbook, Code of Conduct and/or school’s policies and will guide you to be more prepared to fight the charges against you. Even if every venue in the school level is exhausted and the outcome is not favorable for the student, the student advisor may request a meeting directly with the Office of General Counsel (which are the university’s attorneys) to negotiate a better outcome in the student's behalf. Depending on the university and the severity of the sanction, the expungement of disciplinary records is an alternative that could be discussed with the General Counsel.


Mitigating the Impact of Disciplinary Records

However, if you already have a disciplinary record, it's important to take proactive steps to address any concerns that potential employers may have:


  • Reflection and Growth: Reflect on the incident that led to the disciplinary action and consider the lessons learned from the experience. Demonstrating personal growth and the ability to learn from mistakes can help employers see you in a more positive light.
  • Honesty and Transparency: If a prospective employer asks about your disciplinary history, be honest about the incident and show remorse, highlighting how it shaped your personal and professional development. Integrity and transparency can go a long way in building trust with potential employers.
  • Recommendations and References: Secure strong letters of recommendation from professors, mentors, or employers who can vouch for your character, work ethic, and potential. Positive references can help counterbalance any concerns arising from your disciplinary record.
  • Professional Development and Certifications: Engage in continuous learning and professional development activities to demonstrate your commitment to self-improvement and staying current in your field. Obtain certifications or participate in relevant workshops to enhance your skill set and showcase your dedication.


Conclusion

While college disciplinary records may raise concerns for some employers during background checks, it's important to remember that everyone makes mistakes. What truly matters is how you have grown and developed as an individual since that incident. By adopting a proactive approach as early and prepared as possible, demonstrating honesty and personal growth, and showcasing your qualifications and positive attributes, you can mitigate the potential impact of a disciplinary record and position yourself as a strong candidate in the job market. Remember, your past does not define your future, and employers value individuals who show resilience, responsibility, and a commitment to personal and professional growth.

More News & Resources

By Joseph D. Lento 03 May, 2024
Nurses facing abuse or other misconduct charges over inappropriate patient restraint need skilled defense representation.
By Lawrence A. Katz 26 Apr, 2024
The news has recently had almost daily stories about the social media app, Tik Tok, and Congress’ threat to make using it illegal unless its ownership is transferred from its present Chinese owners. The argument for requiring the removal of Chinses owners is that they require access to personal and confidential information and that poses a national security risk. I have seen tech experts who question whether transferring ownership will actually eliminate that threat. They suggest that if the computer code for the Tik Top app already contains a “backdoor” enabling the secret access to information, changing ownership will not correct the problem. This blog is not intended to discuss those issues. Instead, we will address the claims by many that preventing people from using Tik Tok is a First Amendment free speech violation. I suggest that it is not. This is a tidbit to keep for your next Trivia Night. The First Amendment was originally only intended to prohibit the federal government from interfering with free speech. It was not until 1925, in Gitlow v. New York, that the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited all levels of government (states and local governments) from interfering with free speech. A government can limit speech if doing so is content neutral. As the United States Supreme Court has explained, “A regulation of speech is facially content based under the First Amendment if it ‘target[s] speech based on its communicative content’—that is, if it ‘applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed.’” City of Austin v. Reagan Nat'l Advert. of Austin, LLC, 596 U.S. 61 (2022). Thus, where a transit system prohibited all advertisements on its premises, the Court held that the limit was constitutional because it applied to all subjects and opinions. In contrast, a limitation on a single message is not permitted. In Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. SEPTA, 975 F.3d 300, 303 (3d Cir. 2020), a Court of Appeals ruled against a public transit agency’s refusal to accept advertisements that were political or discussed matters of public debate. The regulation was not content neutral. The prohibition against Tik Tok would likely be found constitutional because the prohibition is not based on a specific subject or viewpoint. There is one other issue that must be raised --- it is highly unlikely that a government could prohibit all means of public forums for speech. Even if content neutral, it is unlikely that a government could prohibit all social media any more than it could prohibit all newspapers. However, in the case of Tik Tok, prohibiting it from operating in the United States does not effectively prohibit all means of public forums as several other social media platforms still exist. Thus, the often-voiced opinion that eliminating Tik Tok denies its users their First Amendment rights is inaccurate.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr 26 Apr, 2024
While dogs are often referred to as “man’s best friend,” dogs can also be dangerous, and even the friendliest of dogs may bite when provoked. This this blog post we will discuss some general legal theory about animal bites, including dog bites, and outline what you should do if you were bit by another person’s dog or other animal. Can I Sue for a Dog Bite? Before I answer this question, it is important to understand the legal theory that undergirds animal bite cases. The law classically categorized animals into two categories: domitae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically domesticated or tamed – and ferae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically feral, wild, or exotic. This distinction is significant legally because, generally speaking, those who possess a ferae naturae animal – for example, a tiger – do so at their own peril. This is because if ferae naturae animal bites another person, the owner of the animal is generally presumed to be at-fault. While the owner of a domitae naturae animal can also be held liable for the actions of that animal, generally, a bite by such an animal – for example, a cat or a dog – may not necessarily give rise to a presumption of fault. At least, that was the classical framework. This has been changed by individual laws in many states. Most states have adopted a strict-liability standard in connection with dog bites. This means that a biting dog’s owner will be held liable for injuries caused by the dog, even if the owner used reasonable care to restrain the dog or to protect or warn the other party. Often, this strict-liability view can be viewed as harsh, if one adheres to the “accidents happen” mentality. In recognition of the potentially harsh outcomes strict-liability may bring about, a handful of other states have adopted a “One-Bite Rule”. In essence, a One-Bite Rule is a law that provides that a dog owner may only be held liable if they knew or should have known that the dog has a vicious propensity or is prone to bite, and that owner would only have such knowledge if the dog has bitten someone in the past. In other words, the One-Bite Rule is called this because the owner of a dog with a propensity to bite essentially gets their first bite free because the owner will likely not be found liable for the first bite. This is consistent with the notion of the “foreseeability of the harm” that undergirds much of tort law – in other words, how could the owner foresee that his or her dog would bite if it has never done so before? Conversely, the owner should know, and should therefore be held liable, if the dog has bitten someone before. So, to answer the question of whether you can sue if you have been bitten by a dog, the answer, generally is yes, but the merits of you claim will depend largely on whether you live in a strict-liability state or a One-Bite Rule state. What Do I Do If I Have Been Bitten? While you may, of course, be panicked immediately following a dog bite, it is important to do the following: · Call 911 to report the incident. Make sure a police report is filed, and get a copy of it. · Get the dog owner’s name and contact information, if possible. · Try to get a picture of the dog and the owner, if possible. · Take pictures of the bite wounds while they are still fresh. · Go seek medical treatment, if necessary, and try to leave the appointment with a copy of your medical record in connection with the visit. · Contact a knowledgeable personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. If you or a loved one have been injured by a public actor or public entity, call the Lento Law Group today. Our team of knowledgeable and compassionate attorneys and support staff can help guide you while you work to pick up the pieces after a traumatic accident. Call Lento Law Group today at (856) 652-2000. We will fight to get you the recovery you deserve.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. 26 Apr, 2024
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. July 2023
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 20 April, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 April, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 March, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Lawrence A. Katz, Esquire • 07 Feb, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
Professional discipline in one state can affect a professional license in another state. Don’t run. Get help up front.
01 Mar, 2024
ERIC HAKEEM DEONTAYE MAYS, late Councilman Eric Mays's son and only next of kin, along with Bishop Patrick Munnerlyn, Community Outreach Specialist for the Lento Law Group, cordially invites the Flint community to a candlelight vigil to honor the remarkable life and legacy of Councilman Eric B. Mays. The vigil will take place on Saturday, March 2, at 6:00 PM in front of Flint City Hall, as we come together to celebrate a true hero of Flint, a relentless champion for the community, a visionary leader, a devoted public servant, and a cherished friend. Councilman Mays was a beacon of hope and strength for Flint, advocating tirelessly for the rights and well-being of its residents. His unwavering dedication to serving the community has left an indelible mark on the hearts of all who had the privilege of knowing him. As we gather to remember his remarkable contributions, let us light candles in unity to illuminate the path he paved toward a brighter future for Flint. This vigil is an opportunity for us to reflect on the profound impact of Councilman Mays’ work, to share stories of his courage and kindness, and to reaffirm our commitment to the values he embodied. Participants are welcome to bring their own candles, but candles will also be provided (as long as supplies last) to ensure that everyone can join in this act of remembrance and solidarity. Councilman Mays’ love for the people of Flint was boundless, and in return, he was deeply loved and respected by the community he served. As we mourn his passing, we also celebrate the legacy of a man who dedicated his life to making Flint a better place for all its residents. It has indeed been a sad week in Flint, but let us come together to honor a man who gave so much of himself to our city. Join us in front of Flint City Hall to pay tribute to Councilman Eric B. Mays, a man who deserves the best: our collective love, respect, and admiration. We invite everyone to come and show their support by standing in solidarity as we remember a great man who has left an everlasting mark on our community. Atlanta, GA • Birmingham, AL • Boulder, CO • Coral Springs, FL • Detroit, MI • El Paso, TX • Flint, MI • Honolulu, HI • Los Angeles, CA • Maui, HI Miami, FL • Mount Laurel, NJ • Newark, NJ • New York, NY • Orlando, FL • Philadelphia, PA • Puerta Plata, DR •Richmond, VA • Salt Lake City, UT San Juan, PR • Scottsdale, AZ • Washington, DC 
More Posts
Share by: