Get in touch
SOUTH JERSEY
PHILADELPHIA
FLORIDA

Student Discipline Appeals Procedures: an Overview

Cristina Pietri • Apr 11, 2023

Last month, we discussed an overview of the student disciplinary process, since the early stages such as investigations, and we learned about student disciplinary hearings. Thus, it’s logical to give you a few helpful pieces of information about the process to follow when the outcome of a student disciplinary case is not what you had hoped for. That is, the results were not --in whole or in part— adjudicated to your favor.


After the hearing and/or investigation has concluded, the Student Conduct Office, the Dean of Students, or the office in charge of enforcing the Student Code of Conduct will notify you of the outcome of your case in a decision letter within the time frame designated in the Student Code or Student Handbook. The decision letter tends to quote the Student Code of Conduct’s disposition under which the notification of the decision is required, it states the conclusions of the investigation or hearing, and the grounds for their decision. It should also have a statement of your right to appeal and a time frame to do so. Every university is different, and such deadlines could range from 48 hours to 30 days.


The first and most important thing to do is to find out the deadline to appeal. Once you are aware of the term, you should look for how “day” is defined in the Student Code or Student Handbook. Some universities define “day” as a natural day, some define it as a business day, whereas others define it as a school day. This is crucial because it’s possible that your interpretation of “day” differs from its definition leading you think you have more time to file your appeal letter, and you don’t want to risk the appeal to be denied for tardiness without ever being considered on its merits. 


Once you are certain of the due date of the appeal letter, set realistic expectations and be honest with yourself. Are you able to go through the appeal process by yourself? Do you fully understand the Student Conduct Code or Student Handbook and know how to apply it to the adverse decision? Do you have time to prepare an appeal letter that you feel is compelling enough to overturn the decision? If you are unsure of any of these questions, you should consider contacting a Student Advisor or an attorney with experience in student disciplinary proceedings. Lately, these proceedings are turning more complex and many students, particularly undergraduate students-- do not have the knowledge or skills to successfully argue in their behalf. On the other hand, graduate students tend to have less time available due to the academic workload but want to defend their costly investment in their future.  Lento Law Group and Lento Law Firm have a team of attorneys and support staff who dedicate exclusively to these types of cases. They have worked with hundreds of student cases just like yours and they have the expertise and knowledge to advise you and assist you with your appeal.

If you do believe you have the time, resources, and skills to go through with this appeal by yourself, it’s crucial that you thoroughly read the decision later and the grounds for their decision. Next, you must read the Student Code Handbook and understand the appeal process as set by the school. Commonly, the Student Handbook should list the grounds on which you should base your appeal. For example, a procedural error, bias from the person or persons in charge of your decision, or new evidence has emerged that couldn’t be discovered previously and it has a potential to change the outcome. 


Next, you should ask yourself if what you need reversed could fit in one or more grounds stated in the Handbook for your appeal. What was the procedural error? Do you have evidence of bias from the adjudicator? What is the new evidence and why is it likely to change the school’s decision? 

Once you have identified the grounds under which your appeal will be based, it’s time to draft the appeal letter. Choose your words carefully, and make sure you state the reasons for your disagreement with the decision and/or with the severity of the sanctions imposed. 



If the evidence against you was compelling and/or the finding of facts is somewhat accurate, you should also mention regret for the behavior or circumstances that started the process. Make sure you mention any mitigating factors (such as physical or mental illnesses, living arraignment problems, financial difficulties, family problems at home, or relationship problems,  etc.). It is advisable to mention your current and future contributions to the university:  if you’re part of a sports team, or if your academic credentials are above average, or if you belong to a club or organization in the school. If applicable, you should argue that you have no previous incident with disciplinary action or investigation and that the current one is an unfortunate isolated incident. Make sure that you include a plan for future success, It also helps if you ask someone to read the appeal and give you feedback.


Once you are satisfied with your letter, it’s time to send it. Always make sure you send the letter to the correct official, which usually isn’t the person or panel who adjudicated the matter. It’s also good practice to send a copy of the appeal to the official or panel who decided the sanctions you’re asking to reconsider. 


Oftentimes, the official in charge of the appeal has a term to decide about the appeal, but not all universities have one. In some instances, there could be an appeal hearing where you argue your case. In this instance, it’s helpful to assess again whether you are prepared to appear in a hearing before trained and experienced school officials all by yourself. I strongly advise that, in these stages, to not appear to the hearing by yourself, and to have a student advisor or attorney appear with you in the hearing. Further articles will discuss the appeal hearings in more detail. 


Once the university has reached a decision, it will also be notified to you in a similar matter as the decision letter. Depending on the outcome and the university’s guidelines, that decision might be final or on the contrary, it’s possible to have the right to another appeal to a higher ranking official, usually a Provost. 


As you can see, what at first might seem like a simple and straightforward procedure has many ramifications which could permanently impact your entire future. 


The previous information is not intended to substitute legal advice, it is only for informative purposes. Every case is different, and an education attorney or student advisor is best educated, trained and experienced to provide you with professional advise that will adjust to your particular needs. If you would like to know more, please contact ______ (which number/ email should I include?)


  • Student Handbook reference
  • Cover the usual grounds for appeal
  • Cover the process of appeal
  • Tips to write an appeal. 
  • Hiring an attorney completely changes the dynamics
  • Attorneys are expert interpreting and analyzing policies 
  • Go over to the sections they male reference in every communication: like “ according/ pursuant to sections XYZ
  • Make sure the terms of the decision are defined somewhere in the handbook: pay close attention
  • Make examples of academic misconduct terms
  • When writing the appeal letter, the self-introspection required can be illuminating, especially for the student. This is a humbling opportunity to evaluate what went wrong, consider any mitigating factors (including physical or mental illnesses, roommate problems, financial stresses, family problems at home, etc). And it is an opportunity to describe what will be different in the next semester. (Getting adequate medical treatment, solved roommate issues, settled finances, or improved family issues, etc.)
  • Appeal Hearing
  • Sometimes the appeal hearing is about questions about the evidence, not the facts
  • Usually done by other office or department of 
  • Outcomes
  • Denial
  • What a denial letter should have
  • What’s the next steps
  • Reversal: 
  • What the reversal should look like
  • What can be done

More News & Resources

By Joseph D. Lento 03 May, 2024
Nurses facing abuse or other misconduct charges over inappropriate patient restraint need skilled defense representation.
By Lawrence A. Katz 26 Apr, 2024
The news has recently had almost daily stories about the social media app, Tik Tok, and Congress’ threat to make using it illegal unless its ownership is transferred from its present Chinese owners. The argument for requiring the removal of Chinses owners is that they require access to personal and confidential information and that poses a national security risk. I have seen tech experts who question whether transferring ownership will actually eliminate that threat. They suggest that if the computer code for the Tik Top app already contains a “backdoor” enabling the secret access to information, changing ownership will not correct the problem. This blog is not intended to discuss those issues. Instead, we will address the claims by many that preventing people from using Tik Tok is a First Amendment free speech violation. I suggest that it is not. This is a tidbit to keep for your next Trivia Night. The First Amendment was originally only intended to prohibit the federal government from interfering with free speech. It was not until 1925, in Gitlow v. New York, that the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited all levels of government (states and local governments) from interfering with free speech. A government can limit speech if doing so is content neutral. As the United States Supreme Court has explained, “A regulation of speech is facially content based under the First Amendment if it ‘target[s] speech based on its communicative content’—that is, if it ‘applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed.’” City of Austin v. Reagan Nat'l Advert. of Austin, LLC, 596 U.S. 61 (2022). Thus, where a transit system prohibited all advertisements on its premises, the Court held that the limit was constitutional because it applied to all subjects and opinions. In contrast, a limitation on a single message is not permitted. In Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. SEPTA, 975 F.3d 300, 303 (3d Cir. 2020), a Court of Appeals ruled against a public transit agency’s refusal to accept advertisements that were political or discussed matters of public debate. The regulation was not content neutral. The prohibition against Tik Tok would likely be found constitutional because the prohibition is not based on a specific subject or viewpoint. There is one other issue that must be raised --- it is highly unlikely that a government could prohibit all means of public forums for speech. Even if content neutral, it is unlikely that a government could prohibit all social media any more than it could prohibit all newspapers. However, in the case of Tik Tok, prohibiting it from operating in the United States does not effectively prohibit all means of public forums as several other social media platforms still exist. Thus, the often-voiced opinion that eliminating Tik Tok denies its users their First Amendment rights is inaccurate.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr 26 Apr, 2024
While dogs are often referred to as “man’s best friend,” dogs can also be dangerous, and even the friendliest of dogs may bite when provoked. This this blog post we will discuss some general legal theory about animal bites, including dog bites, and outline what you should do if you were bit by another person’s dog or other animal. Can I Sue for a Dog Bite? Before I answer this question, it is important to understand the legal theory that undergirds animal bite cases. The law classically categorized animals into two categories: domitae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically domesticated or tamed – and ferae naturae – meaning, those animals that are classically feral, wild, or exotic. This distinction is significant legally because, generally speaking, those who possess a ferae naturae animal – for example, a tiger – do so at their own peril. This is because if ferae naturae animal bites another person, the owner of the animal is generally presumed to be at-fault. While the owner of a domitae naturae animal can also be held liable for the actions of that animal, generally, a bite by such an animal – for example, a cat or a dog – may not necessarily give rise to a presumption of fault. At least, that was the classical framework. This has been changed by individual laws in many states. Most states have adopted a strict-liability standard in connection with dog bites. This means that a biting dog’s owner will be held liable for injuries caused by the dog, even if the owner used reasonable care to restrain the dog or to protect or warn the other party. Often, this strict-liability view can be viewed as harsh, if one adheres to the “accidents happen” mentality. In recognition of the potentially harsh outcomes strict-liability may bring about, a handful of other states have adopted a “One-Bite Rule”. In essence, a One-Bite Rule is a law that provides that a dog owner may only be held liable if they knew or should have known that the dog has a vicious propensity or is prone to bite, and that owner would only have such knowledge if the dog has bitten someone in the past. In other words, the One-Bite Rule is called this because the owner of a dog with a propensity to bite essentially gets their first bite free because the owner will likely not be found liable for the first bite. This is consistent with the notion of the “foreseeability of the harm” that undergirds much of tort law – in other words, how could the owner foresee that his or her dog would bite if it has never done so before? Conversely, the owner should know, and should therefore be held liable, if the dog has bitten someone before. So, to answer the question of whether you can sue if you have been bitten by a dog, the answer, generally is yes, but the merits of you claim will depend largely on whether you live in a strict-liability state or a One-Bite Rule state. What Do I Do If I Have Been Bitten? While you may, of course, be panicked immediately following a dog bite, it is important to do the following: · Call 911 to report the incident. Make sure a police report is filed, and get a copy of it. · Get the dog owner’s name and contact information, if possible. · Try to get a picture of the dog and the owner, if possible. · Take pictures of the bite wounds while they are still fresh. · Go seek medical treatment, if necessary, and try to leave the appointment with a copy of your medical record in connection with the visit. · Contact a knowledgeable personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. If you or a loved one have been injured by a public actor or public entity, call the Lento Law Group today. Our team of knowledgeable and compassionate attorneys and support staff can help guide you while you work to pick up the pieces after a traumatic accident. Call Lento Law Group today at (856) 652-2000. We will fight to get you the recovery you deserve.
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. 26 Apr, 2024
By Joseph Cannizzo Jr. July 2023
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 20 April, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff 26 Apr, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 April, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Jeanilou G.T. Maschhoff, Esquire • 06 March, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
By Lawrence A. Katz, Esquire • 07 Feb, 2024
08 Mar, 2024
Professional discipline in one state can affect a professional license in another state. Don’t run. Get help up front.
01 Mar, 2024
ERIC HAKEEM DEONTAYE MAYS, late Councilman Eric Mays's son and only next of kin, along with Bishop Patrick Munnerlyn, Community Outreach Specialist for the Lento Law Group, cordially invites the Flint community to a candlelight vigil to honor the remarkable life and legacy of Councilman Eric B. Mays. The vigil will take place on Saturday, March 2, at 6:00 PM in front of Flint City Hall, as we come together to celebrate a true hero of Flint, a relentless champion for the community, a visionary leader, a devoted public servant, and a cherished friend. Councilman Mays was a beacon of hope and strength for Flint, advocating tirelessly for the rights and well-being of its residents. His unwavering dedication to serving the community has left an indelible mark on the hearts of all who had the privilege of knowing him. As we gather to remember his remarkable contributions, let us light candles in unity to illuminate the path he paved toward a brighter future for Flint. This vigil is an opportunity for us to reflect on the profound impact of Councilman Mays’ work, to share stories of his courage and kindness, and to reaffirm our commitment to the values he embodied. Participants are welcome to bring their own candles, but candles will also be provided (as long as supplies last) to ensure that everyone can join in this act of remembrance and solidarity. Councilman Mays’ love for the people of Flint was boundless, and in return, he was deeply loved and respected by the community he served. As we mourn his passing, we also celebrate the legacy of a man who dedicated his life to making Flint a better place for all its residents. It has indeed been a sad week in Flint, but let us come together to honor a man who gave so much of himself to our city. Join us in front of Flint City Hall to pay tribute to Councilman Eric B. Mays, a man who deserves the best: our collective love, respect, and admiration. We invite everyone to come and show their support by standing in solidarity as we remember a great man who has left an everlasting mark on our community. Atlanta, GA • Birmingham, AL • Boulder, CO • Coral Springs, FL • Detroit, MI • El Paso, TX • Flint, MI • Honolulu, HI • Los Angeles, CA • Maui, HI Miami, FL • Mount Laurel, NJ • Newark, NJ • New York, NY • Orlando, FL • Philadelphia, PA • Puerta Plata, DR •Richmond, VA • Salt Lake City, UT San Juan, PR • Scottsdale, AZ • Washington, DC 
More Posts
Share by: